Instrument Rating vs Multi-Engine Rating: Which Should You Get First?
- 2 days ago
- 3 min read
After earning your Private Pilot License, many students face the next big decision:
Instrument rating vs multi-engine rating — which should you get first? Both ratings expand your skills and career opportunities, but they serve very different purposes in your aviation journey.
In this guide, we’ll compare instrument rating vs multi-engine rating in terms of FAA requirements, career impact, cost considerations, and training strategy — especially for pilots training in Tennessee.

What Is an Instrument Rating?
An Instrument Rating (IR) allows a pilot to fly in low-visibility conditions using instruments rather than visual references. With an instrument rating, you can:
Fly in clouds
Operate in low visibility
Fly under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
Increase overall flight safety and capability
FAA Requirements for Instrument Rating
According to FAA regulations, pilots must complete:
At least 40 hours of instrument training
Cross-country flight requirements
A written knowledge test
A practical checkride
Instrument training is often considered essential for career-focused pilots.
What Is a Multi-Engine Rating?
A Multi-Engine Rating (ME) allows you to operate aircraft with more than one engine.
Unlike the instrument rating, the multi-engine rating is typically an add-on to your existing certificate.
With a multi-engine rating, you can:
Fly twin-engine aircraft
Increase aircraft complexity exposure
Build experience relevant to airline and corporate aviation
There is no specific minimum hour requirement set by the FAA for a multi-engine add-on, but training typically includes:
Multi-engine aerodynamics
Engine-out procedures
Systems training
A practical checkride
Instrument Rating vs Multi-Engine Rating: Key Differences
When comparing instrument rating vs multi-engine rating, the primary differences are purpose and career impact.
Category | Instrument Rating | Multi-Engine Rating |
Primary Focus | Flying in low visibility | Flying aircraft with multiple engines |
FAA Hour Requirement | 40 instrument hours | No fixed minimum; add-on training |
Career Importance | Essential for most professional paths | Important for advanced career progression |
Safety Impact | Significant | Moderate |
Typical Timing | Early career stage | After instrument or commercial |
Why Most Career Pilots Get Instrument First
In most professional pathways, the instrument rating comes before the multi-engine rating.
Here’s why:
Instrument skills are foundational for advanced flying.
Commercial training assumes IFR proficiency.
Airlines and corporate operators expect strong instrument experience.
Safety and weather flexibility increase significantly.
For most students asking instrument rating vs multi-engine rating, the practical answer is: instrument rating first.
When Might Multi-Engine Come First?
There are limited scenarios where multi-engine training may come earlier:
Structured academy programs
Specific employer-sponsored pathways
Pilots already instrument-rated upgrading aircraft type
However, for most students training in Tennessee, the logical progression is:
Private → Instrument → Commercial → Multi-Engine → CFI
Cost & Training Considerations
Multi-engine aircraft typically have higher hourly operating costs due to:
Increased fuel consumption
Additional maintenance complexity
Twin-engine systems
Instrument training, while intensive, can often be completed in single-engine aircraft.
When evaluating instrument rating vs multi-engine rating, financial sequencing matters.
Career Impact Comparison
Instrument Rating
Required for most commercial aviation roles
Necessary for airline eligibility
Expands operational flexibility
Improves pilot safety skills
Multi-Engine Rating
Required for multi-engine aircraft employment
Important for airline track progression
Enhances aircraft handling experience
Both ratings are valuable, but the instrument rating generally has earlier and broader impact.
Ideal Rating Progression for Tennessee Pilots
For structured career progression:
Private Pilot License
Instrument Rating
Commercial Pilot License
Multi-Engine Add-On
Certified Flight Instructor
This order builds skill layers progressively and aligns with FAA training logic.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is instrument rating harder than multi-engine?
Instrument training requires significant mental workload and procedural discipline. Multi-engine training focuses more on systems management and engine-out procedures.
Do airlines require multi-engine time?
Yes. Airline positions require multi-engine experience, typically obtained during commercial or instructor progression.
Can you skip instrument rating and go straight to multi-engine?
Technically possible, but not recommended for most career-focused pilots.
Final Verdict: Instrument Rating vs Multi-Engine Rating
When comparing instrument rating vs multi-engine rating, the answer for most students is clear:
Start with the instrument rating.
It provides foundational skill, expands operational capability, and aligns with long-term professional aviation goals. The multi-engine rating is important — but it usually makes the most sense after instrument proficiency and commercial progression. Understanding the right order helps you avoid unnecessary cost and build your career efficiently.



